A UK House of Lords member requests the BBC to postpone airingDolar Amarshi Popat, a member of the House of Lords, wrote a letter on Tuesday to Tim Davie, the director general of BBC Broadcasting House, requesting that he halt the airing of the second instalment of the documentary series in order to prevent aggravating the already tense situation between British Hindus and Muslims in many cities throughout the UK. He also advised BBC to check the facts and make sure the reporting is accurate. the second part of the Modi documentaryA UK House of Lords membDolar Amarshi Popat, a member of the House of Lords, wrote a letter on Tuesday to Tim Davie, the director general of BBC Broadcasting House, requesting that he halt the airing of the second instalment of the documentary series in order to prevent aggravating the already tense situation between British Hindus and Muslims in many cities throughout the UK. He also advised BBC to check the facts and make sure the reporting is accurate.er requests the BBC to postpone airing the second part of the Modi documentary..

World News

“The documentary failed to adequately capture the string of events that have occurred since the riots and was incredibly biassed. Th

“The documentary failed to adequately capture the string of events that have occurred since the riots and was incredibly biassed. The Indian judiciary and parliament absolved Prime Minister Modi of his involvement, which contributed to his re-election as a respected leader, according to his letter.

Since gaining independence, India has made significant strides toward diversity and has passed laws guaranteeing that everyone is protected, regardless of colour, creed, or gender. It has issues, which should be contested, not only because it is the largest democracy in the world but also because it is located in a region where many nations do not offer the same freedoms. However, any challenge must take into account both perspectives and be mindful of the difficulties that a condemnation presents.

e Indian judiciary and parliam

Popat then instructed him to take care that this documentary didn’t tarnish that stellar reputation.

India condemned the contentious BBC documentary series on Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday and referred to it as “propaganda work” that aims to forward a discredited thesis.

Arindam Bagchi, a spokesperson for the External Affairs Ministry, stated during a weekly media briefing that this documentary show, which was based on an internal UK report, exhibits a colonial mindset.

ent absolved Prime Minister Modi of his involvement, which contributed to his re-election as a respected leader, according to his letter.

Since gaining independence, India has made significant strides toward diversity and has passed laws guaranteeing that everyone is protected, regardless of colour, creed, or gender. It has issues, which should be contested, not only

“This is propaganda, in our opinion, meant to back up a specific, refuted assertion. Recent events have made it very evident that there is prejudice, a lack of objectivity, and a continuing colonial worldview.” Bagchi reacted when asked about the PM documentary series.

The BBC, the nation’s public broadcaster, aired a two-part series during the Gujarat riots of 2002 criticising PM Narendra Modi’s tenure as Gujarat’s chief minister. The documentary was pulled by some sites after receiving unfavourable reviews.

Prominent British citizens of Indian heritage criticised the series. According to famous UK resident Lord Rami Ranger, the BBC “caused a massive lot of grief to over a billion Indians.”

“This is propaganda, in our opinion, meant to back up a specific, refuted assertion. Recent events have made it very evident that there is prejudice, a lack of objectivity, and a continuing colonial worldview.” Bagchi reacted when asked about the PM documentary series.

The BBC, the nation’s public broadcaster, aired a two-part series during the Gujarat riots of 2002 criticising PM Narendra Modi’s tenure as Gujarat’s chief minister. The documentary was pulled by some sites after receiving unfavourable reviews.

Prominent British citizens of Indian heritage criticised the series. According to famous UK resident Lord Rami Ranger, the BBC “caused a massive lot of grief to over a billion Indians.”

because it is the largest democracy in the world but also because it is located in a region where many nations do not offer the same freedoms. However, any challenge must take into account both perspectives and be mindful of the difficulties that a condemnation presents.

A UK House of Lords membeDolar Amarshi Popat, a member of the House of Lords, wrote a letter on Tuesday to Tim Davie, the director general of BBC Broadcasting House, requesting that he halt the airing of the second instalment of the documentary series in order to prevent aggravating the already tense situation between British Hindus and Muslims in many cities throughout the UK. He also advised BBC to check the facts and make sure the reporting is accurate.

Dolar Amarshi Popat, a member of the House of Lords, wrote a letter on Tuesday to Tim Davie, the director general of BBC Broadcasting House, requesting that he halt the airing of the second instalment of the documentary series in order to prevent aggravating the already tense situation between British Hindus and Muslims in many cities throughout the UK. He also advised BBC to check the facts and make sure the reporting is accurate.

Popat stated that he was “shocked by the documentary produced by the BBC implicating the Hon. Prime Minister of India in the Gujarat riots of 2002 which aired on January 17, 2023,” adding that the media organisation plays a crucial role in educating the UK population and is a dependable source of information throughout the world.

“The documentary was incredib

Popat stated that h

“Since gaining its independence, India has achieved significant strides in the area of diversity and has enshrined the protection of all people under the law, regardless of their colour, creed, or gender. It has issues, which should be contested, not only because it is the largest democracy in the world but also because it is located in a region where many nations do not offer the same freedoms. Any challenge should, however, take into account all viewpoints while also being cognizant of the difficulties that a condemnation of one side may cause, “It was ad.

Popat then instructed him to take care that this documentary didn’t tarnish that stellar reputation.

India on Thursday slammed the divisive BBC Prime Minister Narendra Modi documentary series and called it a “propaganda work” that is intended to

“Since gaining its independence, India has achieved significant strides in the area of diversity and has enshrined the protection of all people under the law, regardless of their colour, creed, or gender. It has issues, which should be contested, not only because it is the largest democracy in the world but also because it is located in a region where many nations do not offer the same freedoms. Any challenge should, however, take into account all viewpoints while also being cognizant of the difficulties that a condemnation of one side may cause, “It was ad.

Popat then instructed him to take care that this documentary didn’t tarnish that stellar reputation.

India on Thursday slammed the divisive BBC Prime Minister Narendra Modi documentary series and called it a “propaganda work” that is intended to

Arindam Bagchi, a spokesperson for the External Affairs Ministry, stated during a weekly media briefing that this documentary show, which was based on an internal UK report, exhibits a colonial mindset.

“We believe that this is pr

Arindam Bagchi, a spokesperson for the External Affairs Ministry, stated during a weekly media briefing that this documentary show, which was based on an internal UK report, exhibits a colonial mindset.

“We believe that this is propaganda intended to promote a specific false narrative. In answer to a query on the PM documentary series, Bagchi remarked, “The bias, the lack of objectivity, and frankly the lingering colonial attitude are belatedly obvious.

During the Gujarat riots of 2002, the national broadcaster of the UK, BBC, aired a two-part series criticising PM Narendra Modi’s time in office as Gujarat’s chief minister. Following backlash, some platforms pulled the documentary.

well-known Indian origin The series was criticised by UK citizens. Lord Rami Ranger, a prominent British citizen, claimed that the “BBC inflicted significant harm to over a billion people.”

UK’S HOUSE OF LORDS MEMBER ASKS BBC TO HALT SCREENING OF SECOND PART DOCUMENTARY ON MODI

Dolar Amarshi Popat, a member of the House of Lords, wrote a letter on Tuesday to Tim Davie, the director general of BBC Broadcasting House, requesting that he halt the airing of the second instalment of the documentary series in order to prevent aggravating the already tense situation between British Hindus and Muslims in many cities throughout the UK. He also advised BBC to check the facts and make sure the reporting is accurate.

Popat stated that he was “shocked by the documentary produced by the BBC implicating the Hon. Prime Minister of India in the Gujarat riots of 2002 which aired on January 17, 2023,” adding that the media organisation plays a crucial role in educating the UK population and is a dependable source of information throughout the world.

“The documentary failed to adequately capture the string of events that have occurred since the riots and was incredibly biassed. The Indian judiciary and parliament absolved Prime Minister Modi of his involvement, which contributed to his re-election as a respected leader, according to his letter.

Since gaining independence, India has made significant strides toward diversity and has passed laws guaranteeing that everyone is protected, regardless of colour, creed, or gender. It has issues, which should be contested, not only because it is the largest democracy in the world but also because it is located in a region where many nations do not offer the same

Arindam Bagchi, a spokesperson for the External Affairs Ministry, stated during a weekly media briefing that this documentary show, which was based on an internal UK report, exhibits a colonial mindset.

“We believe that this is propaganda intended to promote a specific false narrative. In answer to a query on the PM documentary series, Bagchi remarked, “The bias, the lack of objectivity, and frankly the lingering colonial attitude are belatedly obvious.

During the Gujarat riots of 2002, the national broadcaster of the UK, BBC, aired a two-part series criticising PM Narendra Modi’s time in office as Gujarat’s chief minister. Following backlash, some platforms pulled the documentary.

well-known Indian origin The series was criticised by UK citizens. Lord Rami Ranger, a prominent British citizen, claimed that the “BBC inflicted significant harm to over a billion people.”

freedoms. However, any challenge must take into account both perspectives and be mindful of the difficulties that a condemnation presents.

opaganda intended to promote a specific false narrative. In answer to a query on the PM documentary series, Bagchi remarked, “The bias, the lack of objectivity, and frankly the lingering colonial attitude are belatedly obvious.

During the Gujarat riots of 2002, the national broadcaster of the UK, BBC, aired a two-part series criticising PM Narendra Modi’s time in office as Gujarat’s chief minister. Following backlash, some platforms pulled the documentary.

well-known Indian origin The series was criticised by UK citizens. Lord Rami Ranger, a prominent British citizen, claimed that the “BBC inflicted significant harm to over a billion people.”

e was “shocked by the documentary produced by the BBC implicating the Hon. Prime Minister of India in the Gujarat riots of 2002 which aired on January 17, 2023,” adding that the media organisation plays a crucial role in educating the UK population and is a dependable source of information throughout the world.

“The documentary was incredibly biassed and did not adequately capture the string of developments that have occurred since the riots. The Indian judiciary and parliament cleared Prime Minister Modi of his involvement, which contributed to his re-election as a respected leader “examine his letter.

ly biassed and did not adequately capture the string of developments that have occurred since the riots. The Indian judiciary and parliament cleared Prime Minister Modi of his involvement, which contributed to his re-election as a respected leader “examine his letter.

r requests the BBC to postpone airing the second part of the Modi documentary.

“This, in our opinion, is propaganda meant to forward a specific, debunked thesis. The bias, lack of objectivity, and frankly, continued colonial mindset are only now becoming apparent “In answer to a query regarding the PM documentary series, Bagchi stated.

During the Gujarat riots of 2002, the national broadcaster of the UK, BBC, aired a two-part series criticising PM Narendra Modi’s time in office as Gujarat’s chief minister. Following backlash, some platforms pulled the documentary.

Leading British citizens of Indian descent criticised the series. Lord Rami Ranger, a prominent British citizen, claimed that the “BBC caused immense harm to over a billion Indians.”

Popat then instr

“This, in our opinion, is propaganda meant to forward a specific, debunked thesis. The bias, lack of objectivity, and frankly, continued colonial mindset are only now becoming apparent “In answer to a query regarding the PM documentary series, Bagchi stated.

During the Gujarat riots of 2002, the national broadcaster of the UK, BBC, aired a two-part series criticising PM Narendra Modi’s time in office as Gujarat’s chief minister. Following backlash, some platforms pulled the documentary.

Leading British citizens of Indian descent criticised the series. Lord Rami Ranger, a prominent British citizen, claimed

“We believe that this is propaganda intended to support a specific, debunked claim. Lately, it has become clear that there is bias, a lack of objectivity, and a persistent colonial mindset “When asked about the PM documentary series, Bagchi responded.

During the Gujarat riots of 2002, the BBC, the country’s national broadcaster, aired a two-part series criticising PM Narendra Modi’s term as Gujarat’s chief minister. After receiving negative feedback, some outlets withdrew the documentary.

The series was criticised by prominent British people of Indian descent. The BBC “inflicted a huge lot of pain to over a billion Indians,” according to prominent UK citizen Lord Rami Ranger.

that the “BBC caused immense harm to over a billion Indians.”

ucted him to take care that this documentary didn’t tarnish that stellar reputation.

India condemned the contentious BBC documentary series on Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday and referred to it as “propaganda work” that aims to forward a discredited thesis.

Arindam Bagchi, a spokesperson for the External Affairs Ministry, stated during a weekly media briefing that this documentary show, which was based on an internal UK report, exhibits a colonial mindset.

Breaking News in Hindi China global news headlines in hindi India India Russia news in Hindi international news PM Modi Russia दुनिया खबरें विश्व समाचार

Related Posts