DIGVIJAYA SINGH REQUESTS “SURGICAL STRIKE PROOF,” BUT CONGRESS DISAGREES, TERMINATING HIS STATEMENT AS “PERSONAL.”

World News

New Delhi: Congress on Monday distanced itself from Digvijaya Singh’s assertion that it supports “any military activities” in the “national interest” amid the political uproar over his comments on surgical strikes.

After receiving criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party and defence experts for saying that there is “no proof of the surgical strike that took place against Pakistan,” Jairam Ramesh made a clarification. Ramesh asserted on Twitter that the UPA government also carried out the surgical strikes.

The senior politician Digvijaya Singh’s opinions are entirely his own and do not represent the views of the Congress. The UPA administration carried out surgical strikes prior to 2014. Congress has backed and will support

The attack was allegedly carried out by the Center, notwithstanding Digvijaya Singh’s assertion that there is no evidence supporting the surgical strike against Pakistan. In his speech today in Jammu, Digvijaya Singh remarked, “They (the Centre) talk about surgical strikes and claim they have killed so many of them, but there is no proof.”

Earlier today, the opposition party was accused of “insulting” the armed services and being “blinded” by its “hatred” for Prime Minister Narendra Modi, according to the Bharatiya Janata Party. It was also said that such claims were made at the direction of the senior leadership of the Congress.

The national spokesperson for the BJP, Gaurav Bhatia, claimed that the Congress party’s “irresponsible remarks” have become part of its “character.” On the orders of Rahul Gandhi, Congress leaders are doing the Bharat todo. Insensitive words are now associated with Digvijaya Singh. The Army has an unshakeable reputation for being above politics. You would ask for evidence repeatedly if the Army had claimed that a surgical strike had taken place. This demonstrates your lack of trust in our Army, according to Bhatia.

“Making reckless comments has evolved into the hallmark of Congress. However, it won’t be tolerated if they criticise the Indian Army. It appears that Digvijaya Singh and Rahul Gandhi’s animosity of Narendra Modi has blinded them. Even they don’t

The expert advised Congress to “ask the Pakistanis” if it wanted to see the proof.

Defense analyst Bakshi stated to ANI, “The Army offers no supporting evidence. What evidence should be provided, and why? You should ask Pakistanis if you want to know. They will tell you if they are your pals; if not, they won’t. The Army cannot be forced to provide evidence. The government is free to provide evidence if it chooses. However, the administration is also aware that doing so would go against Army policy. The attack site was completely destroyed by the Pakistanis. It is irrelevant who says what. It doesn’t seem like a question to me. The press shouldn’t cover this.”

The expert advised Congress to “ask the Pakistanis” if it wanted to see the proof.

Defense analyst Bakshi stated to ANI, “The Army offers no supporting evidence. What evidence should be provided, and why? You should ask Pakistanis if you want to know. They will tell you if they are your pals; if not, they won’t. The Army cannot be forced to provide evidence. The government is free to provide evidence if it chooses. However, the administration is also aware that doing so would go against Army policy. The attack site was completely destroyed by the Pakistanis. It is irrelevant who says what. It doesn’t seem like a question to me. The press shouldn’t cover this.”

A specialist

“It is about national security. The strike was conducted for the country. Neither the Army nor the government is bound to answer how and why the strikes were conducted. Pakistan has come to its knees after the strikes. Now their Prime Minister wants good relations with India. It is the duty of the Army not to answer even if the almighty asks,” he said.

The expert advised Congress to “ask the Pakistanis” if it wanted to see the proof.

Defense analyst Bakshi stated to ANI, “The Army offers no supporting evidence. What evidence should be provided, and why? You should ask Pakistanis if you want to know. They will tell you if they are your pals; if not, they won’t. The Army cannot be forced to provide evidence. The government is free to provide evidence if it chooses. However, the administration is also aware that doing so would go against Army policy. The attack site was completely destroyed by the Pakistanis. It is irrelevant who says what. It doesn’t seem like a question to me. The press shouldn’t cover this.”

Breaking News in Hindi China global news headlines in hindi India India Russia news in Hindi international news PM Modi Russia दुनिया खबरें विश्व समाचार

Related Posts