Regarding the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in combat, the Chinese military has warned unequivocally that although AI can improve decision-making, it cannot take the place of human judgment. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Daily just issued an article outlining this position.
According to the PLA, AI should complement human abilities rather than take their place. AI can help with planning, simulations, and data analysis, but human commanders must have the last say in all decisions.
The military emphasized a number of AI’s intrinsic drawbacks, such as its inability to be creative, self-aware, or dynamically adjust to shifting battlefield situations. AI frequently lacks the creativity necessary for a successful military strategy and operates within predetermined algorithmic bounds.
The PLA has described an ideal operational model in which “humans plan and AI executes.” This concept guarantees that human oversight is still essential to protect against any errors originating from AI’s “black-box” character, even while machines may analyze data and recommend actions.
The significance of accountability in military operations was emphasized in the article. Current AI systems lack the capacity for human commanders to evaluate their choices and modify their plans in response to developments in real time. For military officials, this lack of accountability is a serious worry.
The PLA’s strategy shows a careful incorporation of technology into military operations, even while it acknowledges the potential of AI. While retaining human agency as essential to command effectiveness, they want to use AI to increase operational efficiency.
A balanced approach to incorporating AI into warfare is highlighted by the Chinese military’s viewpoint, which emphasizes that although technology can improve operational capabilities, human decision-making is still crucial in complex and dynamic contexts like the battlefield.
