S. Jaishankar, the minister of external affairs, recently spoke about the state of affairs along the India-China border, specifically in relation to the buffer zones created during disengagement procedures. In a speech to the Lok Sabha, he laid out fundamental guidelines for dealing with China in the wake of a recent deal to end military standoffs.
Jaishankar justified the establishment of buffer zones, saying that they were put in place to stop future hostilities between Chinese and Indian forces at strategic locations like Pangong Lake. Depending on how things develop at the Line of Actual Control (LAC), he said, these actions were “temporary and limited” and could be reviewed as needed.
He said that although patrolling in some places is currently prohibited, this can also be reevaluated if circumstances change.
Historical Context: Stressing the importance of peace in these regions for advancing relations with China, Jaishankar gave a historical summary of the border conflicts. He reaffirmed that future interactions would be guided by India’s national security objectives.
Responses and Remarks
Jaishankar has faced criticism for his remarks. Veterans of the armed forces have questioned the buffer zones’ efficacy, claiming that by limiting access to customary grazing grounds, they have negatively impacted local lives. They raise questions regarding territorial integrity and strategic location along the LAC, arguing that the accords reached do not sufficiently restore the status quo before April 2020.
In light of the recent border tensions, Jaishankar’s remarks demonstrate India’s careful approach to handling its relationship with China. The focus on buffer zones and possible modifications to
